Sandra Rizza
Great sidetrack or more pages of witness' dark the recent history of Italy ? Since he pronounced the name of Gianni De Gennaro, head of Dis, a former police chief, and especially former employee Giovanni Falcone, the Supertest Massimo Ciancimino seems to have suddenly lost all its appeal from the prosecutor of Caltanissetta , who have entered under investigation for defamation. Technical explanation: the son of Don Vito would at first revealed to an investigator''confidential''by giving the true identity 'of Mr. Franco with a shot of her:''But you have not understood that Mr. Franco and 'De Gennaro ? ''And then, before a verbal and a pm, that is put in front of 'officer' of a formal statement, he backpedaled:''Macchi'.... the mysterious 007 not 'De Gennaro, but a character near De Gennaro.'' So 'at least Massimo Ciancimino says he learned from his father in illo tempore.
Tired of a pull-and-spring that lasts for months on the mystery of the spy who would monitor step by step negotiations between the state and mafia, the prosecutors Caltanissetta pero 'at this point, I jumped on the chair. They have said enough to explain their disappointment and came up with the tenets of Aristotelian logic: either the secret agent and friend of the illustrious superpoliziotto Falcone are the same person - how Massimo said the agency before Dia - or they are two different people - and then Max has lied at least once. Sic here is the indictment for slander. But also for aiding and abetting Mr. Franco and diffusion (the reporters) and the news that 'prohibited disclosure. For the son of Don Vito,''the conversation off the record''with the investigator nisseno the DIA, is likely at this point to weigh a ton. Penalty: the total collapse of its credibility '. Supertestimone with a mark of slander, in fact, not going anywhere. Gloating, in these hours, the judges of the Court of Appeal of the trial of Marcello Dell'Utri (sentenced to 7 years imprisonment) who would not listen to the son of Don Vito in the courtroom, accused of unreliability prior'''' '.
Tired of a pull-and-spring that lasts for months on the mystery of the spy who would monitor step by step negotiations between the state and mafia, the prosecutors Caltanissetta pero 'at this point, I jumped on the chair. They have said enough to explain their disappointment and came up with the tenets of Aristotelian logic: either the secret agent and friend of the illustrious superpoliziotto Falcone are the same person - how Massimo said the agency before Dia - or they are two different people - and then Max has lied at least once. Sic here is the indictment for slander. But also for aiding and abetting Mr. Franco and diffusion (the reporters) and the news that 'prohibited disclosure. For the son of Don Vito,''the conversation off the record''with the investigator nisseno the DIA, is likely at this point to weigh a ton. Penalty: the total collapse of its credibility '. Supertestimone with a mark of slander, in fact, not going anywhere. Gloating, in these hours, the judges of the Court of Appeal of the trial of Marcello Dell'Utri (sentenced to 7 years imprisonment) who would not listen to the son of Don Vito in the courtroom, accused of unreliability prior'''' '.
But prosecutors in Palermo, that the revelations of the young Ciancimino have built the maxi-inquiry to the sound of bombs on the dialogue between the State and the Mafia, there are. Unnecessarily, the chief prosecutor Francesco Messineo throws cold water on the expected controversy''denying rumors of a rift with fellow nisseni'':''In related investigations, he says - it is normal that there are differences between the prosecutors, or better that they are made of the evaluations are not perfectly comparable. In this sense, the investigation should be read for libel on the Attorney Massimo Ciancimino Caltanissetta.''
Divergence, then. Nothing more '. But voices from sin (the prosecution Panormita) fled, and promptly reported by the agency Ansa , sembrano offrire una valutazione ben diversa della discrasia tra gli uffici giudiziari. "E' strano - fanno notare a Palermo - che prima di svolgere indagini sulla persona indicata da Ciancimino (De Gennaro, ndr) si indaghi lui per calunnia". Poffarbacco. La frase riportata dall'Ansa sembra rilevare un atteggiamento quanto meno '' tiepido '' della procura nissena davanti all'eventualita' di coinvolgere nelle indagini sulle stragi il nome di De Gennaro, un nome che, evidentemente, fa tremare.
E' tutto qui il succo della storia. Si interrogano gli inquirenti a Palermo: perche' se Ciancimino parla -tra mille altalene di se, di ma, e di non so - di Mori , di Mancino, kidney, to rest, Ruffini, none of the pm instead of jumping on the chair and when he speaks of De Gennaro triggered the indictment, before you even check the veracity 'of his statements? Why 'statements are uncertain and contradictory claim in Caltanissetta. But Palermo, the usual entries from sen fled, are still noted:''There is no 'wonder if the Supertest was hesitant attitude in this matter. If his statements about Mr. Franco hit near De Gennaro and 'more' than plausible that the young Ciancimino be frightened.'' Of course, now, there 'is that the Supertest and' closed like a clam. Quoted by nisseni pm, and is 'exercised the right' to not respond. And then, rancorous, said,''I have to defend myself a proxy with which to collaborate thought.'' Result? A piece of the political class and 'ready to play''ola''. We feel
Fabrizio Cicchitto , parent PDL in the House:''Even before the slander against De Gennaro, Jr. Ciancimino for us was unreliable. And it is very serious that there are still people - like the prosecutors in Palermo - try to save a case by case, in part, the reliability. It 'obvious attempt to use Ciancimino jr \u200b\u200b in key policy as a tool against anyone'. It is also obvious attempt to use the indictment as a means of pro-Ciancimino someone. For example, that Mr. Berlusconi said in Massimo meetings in Milan with Don Vito''to talk business.'' Confirmed, at this point, the direct testimony of the mother, Epiphany Scardino, who participated 'in these meetings. Precipitate, therefore, the indictment for slander ? Or just punishment for a charlatan who likes to mock the powerful? For posterity will judge.
Voglioscendere.it
0 comments:
Post a Comment