Giorgio Bongiovanni and Lorenzo Baldo
We have already written an open letter to the challenging Joseph Ayala His unfortunate statement on lifting of stocks to judges serving in the front line, in Palermo. While stressing that he thought fit scornfully that some judges would have lived as "the disappearance of a status symbol."
At the former senator of the Republic had also contested the allegations against Mr. sarcastic. Antonino Di Matteo called "young colleague who represents the National Association of Magistrates of Palermo" and "began to take its first steps as magistrate until 1993." Today we believe that the former
pm the Maxi has exceeded all bounds of decency and dell'impudenza. Define the brother of Paolo Borsellino, Salvatore, as "A man who has mental health problems," risking comparison with the comparison between the two biblical "Abel had a brother, disgusts us. Giuseppe Ayala not only answers questions he called "rants" posted by Salvatore Borsellino www.19luglio1992.com on its site but also allows you to offend him strutting about as one who for 10 years of his life was "the voice of the anti-mafia pool" . Now, leaving aside the sympathy towards those who need income to live on exploiting friendships, experiences and memories, is the disgust at the cowardly attack by a man - and this is a fact a fact - that the quest for truth on the massacre in via D'Amelio has done nothing but confuse the tables. The traces of its various versions of the bag on the discovery of Paolo Borsellino were acts of criminal proceedings which saw the policeman John Arcangioli writing under investigation by the prosecutor in Caltanissetta for aggravated theft.
And if Ayala is proclaimed "the voice of the anti-mafia pool" because it does not ask what its conflicting versions have not helped to dissolve the least one of the most impenetrable mysteries of our contemporary history? It is not enough memory on the pretext of AC to justify their statements that investigators have only led to confusion. Unfortunately, the Supreme Court prevented through a proper trial in a courtroom could restore the truth about the discovery of the grant Paolo Borsellino. So what historians call "singular versions of statements by a witness" will remain as a subject to see how often the mysteries of the state are dotted with glimpses of who poses as a leading man but there is always only one "occurrence" that - only for a period of his life - has undoubtedly played a major role.
Beyond all our total and unconditional solidarity with Salvatore Borsellino to which we are indebted for its authentic search for truth on what was a massacre State remains a final consideration to make.
Among the different aspects of the events of Joseph Ayala there is one on which he would like a precise answer. In an interview on July 23, 2009 (reproduced in our book "The Last Days of Paolo Borsellino) Ayala returned to his second release claiming to have personally taken the bag of Paolo Borsellino, a former prosecutor at the Maxi Trial reiterates that it did not open since it had MP and had no way to do it. The former senator continues in the story stating that once you find the bag has been handed to an officer of the police, then pointed out that "it is likely that the agenda was inside the bag and that is been made to disappear. " At this point, Dr. Ayala will tell us once and for all: according to what his knowledge of the opinion that the red diary was made to disappear? By whom and for what reasons? Tell
please!
antimafiaduemila.com
0 comments:
Post a Comment